<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lung Cancer Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gapminder.org/videos/lung-cancer-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/lung-cancer-statistics/</link>
	<description>Unveiling the beauty of statistics for a fact based world view.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Rosling: Global health expert and data visionary &#124; OBRA MAESTRA</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/lung-cancer-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Rosling: Global health expert and data visionary &#124; OBRA MAESTRA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/?p=1878#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>[...] this Video      Lung Cancer Statistics Posted May 7, 2009    Iceland “leading” march [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this Video      Lung Cancer Statistics Posted May 7, 2009    Iceland “leading” march [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oskar</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/lung-cancer-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>Oskar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/?p=1878#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also like to point out that poor countries do not have adequate health care to properly diagnose lung cancer, so that might skew the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also like to point out that poor countries do not have adequate health care to properly diagnose lung cancer, so that might skew the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/lung-cancer-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/?p=1878#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>I also wonder if people in the ultra-low income countries grow old enough to show up in long cancer statistics. Lung cancer usually starts at an &#039;older age&#039;. You of course first have to get to that age...

PS. Great side, superb videos, very nicely presented (both in graphics as in speech).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wonder if people in the ultra-low income countries grow old enough to show up in long cancer statistics. Lung cancer usually starts at an &#8216;older age&#8217;. You of course first have to get to that age&#8230;</p>
<p>PS. Great side, superb videos, very nicely presented (both in graphics as in speech).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/lung-cancer-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/?p=1878#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>Very nice site! Great statistics!

I have a little critique: The presentation of the percentages are somehow confusing, because the women do not make up 10% of the men. I would find it more appropriate, if you present a percentage of the entire population as ca. 10% and then 40$ instaed of 66%. OR present the ratio between number of men and women. I know that&#039;s what a percentage can represent. However, ordinary perception and associations are commonly different.

Best wishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice site! Great statistics!</p>
<p>I have a little critique: The presentation of the percentages are somehow confusing, because the women do not make up 10% of the men. I would find it more appropriate, if you present a percentage of the entire population as ca. 10% and then 40$ instaed of 66%. OR present the ratio between number of men and women. I know that&#8217;s what a percentage can represent. However, ordinary perception and associations are commonly different.</p>
<p>Best wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

