<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon dioxide (Energy)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gapminder.org/videos/gapcasts/gapcast-10-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/gapcasts/gapcast-10-energy/</link>
	<description>Unveiling the beauty of statistics for a fact based world view.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/gapcasts/gapcast-10-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/low_hanging_fruit/?p=448#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Null, I completely have to disagree.

You indeed CAN catch CO2 in the power plants and pump it down into the earth. Google it, the technology is not so far away. But of course doing that doesnt come for free. You have to pay for it.
Still it is the most realistic option.

Unfortunately I have to tell you your proposition is unrealistic:

Solar energy is no option.

People need energy the whole day. But when do you have energy from solar plants? Only by day. Building one solar plant for day production and relying on (probly mostly coal/gas/oil plants) at night is unrealistic because expensive. Why expensive? Because you need 2 power plants for the same amount of energy, one used at day and one used at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Null, I completely have to disagree.</p>
<p>You indeed CAN catch CO2 in the power plants and pump it down into the earth. Google it, the technology is not so far away. But of course doing that doesnt come for free. You have to pay for it.<br />
Still it is the most realistic option.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I have to tell you your proposition is unrealistic:</p>
<p>Solar energy is no option.</p>
<p>People need energy the whole day. But when do you have energy from solar plants? Only by day. Building one solar plant for day production and relying on (probly mostly coal/gas/oil plants) at night is unrealistic because expensive. Why expensive? Because you need 2 power plants for the same amount of energy, one used at day and one used at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Rosling: Global health expert and data visionary &#124; OBRA MAESTRA</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/gapcasts/gapcast-10-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Rosling: Global health expert and data visionary &#124; OBRA MAESTRA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/low_hanging_fruit/?p=448#comment-197</guid>
		<description>[...] this Video      Carbon dioxide (Energy) Posted January 24, 2008    CO2 emissions in USA and China compared.How to produce electricity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this Video      Carbon dioxide (Energy) Posted January 24, 2008    CO2 emissions in USA and China compared.How to produce electricity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/gapcasts/gapcast-10-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/low_hanging_fruit/?p=448#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Kate...I&#039;m sorry but you&#039;re wrong.  The net energy gain from nuclear is the same as wind energy...this has been documented in many, many places.
Nuclear is limited in scope and thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate&#8230;I&#8217;m sorry but you&#8217;re wrong.  The net energy gain from nuclear is the same as wind energy&#8230;this has been documented in many, many places.<br />
Nuclear is limited in scope and thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Null</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/gapcasts/gapcast-10-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Null</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/low_hanging_fruit/?p=448#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Or if you capture and store the CO2 from teh power plants you can reduce emissions. This seems unrealistic however. The best plan is solar energy. The technology is there, we just need to reduce costs and ramp up production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or if you capture and store the CO2 from teh power plants you can reduce emissions. This seems unrealistic however. The best plan is solar energy. The technology is there, we just need to reduce costs and ramp up production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/gapcasts/gapcast-10-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/low_hanging_fruit/?p=448#comment-201</guid>
		<description>You mean like nuclear? The only solution that can work right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean like nuclear? The only solution that can work right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Statistics Come to Life! &#171; Young Economics.</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/gapcasts/gapcast-10-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Statistics Come to Life! &#171; Young Economics.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/low_hanging_fruit/?p=448#comment-195</guid>
		<description>[...] Carbon Dioxide Emissions: US vs. China [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carbon Dioxide Emissions: US vs. China [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j-wad.com &#187; Carbon Dioxide Visualizations</title>
		<link>http://www.gapminder.org/videos/gapcasts/gapcast-10-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>j-wad.com &#187; Carbon Dioxide Visualizations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gapminder.org/low_hanging_fruit/?p=448#comment-194</guid>
		<description>[...] more relevant to this blog, however, is his visualizations of Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Check it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more relevant to this blog, however, is his visualizations of Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Check it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
